United states v bass

united states v bass Opinion for united states v bass — brought to you by free law project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

United states v bass, 404 u s 336, and jama v immigration and customs enforcement, 543 u s 335, do not require this court to ap-ply lockhart’s countervailing series-qualifier principle in those cas-es, the court simply observed that the last-antecedent rule may be. Supreme court of the united states united states v john bass on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit no 01—1471 decided june 28, 2002 per curiam. No 06-35669 in the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit muhammed s farrakhan (a/k/a ernest s walker-bey) al-kareem shadeed, marcus. Respondent was convicted in the southern district of new york of possessing firearms in violation of title vii of the omnibus crime control and safe streets act of 1968, 18 uscapp § 1202(a) in pertinent part, that statute reads: 'any person who- (1) has been convicted by a court of the united. The united states supreme court applied the analysis of a rmsmg a non- capital case, to bass 7 in order for a capital defendant to obtain discovery on a claim of selective prosecution, he must meet the requirements of a rnmrrg.

Notes: in scarborough v united states , the government came prepared to show that the firearm in question had once moved in interstate commerce, but did not provide a strong link that the person convicted was involved in any way in interstate commerce or got the firearms after his felony conviction. Supreme court ruled incorrectly in the united state v bass the rulings of the supreme court against the case of united states v bass were incorrect because of various reasons: the courts in the united states charged many blacks with offenses which were death eligible twice more than they did to the whites and it is more often engaged in a. Audio transcription for oral argument - october 18, 1971 in united states v bass warren e burger:-- in number 71, united states against bass.

United states v bass, 536 us 862 (2002) i introduction in united states v bass,' the supreme court, in a per curiam opinion, selective prosecution defense was united states v armstrong27 in armstrong, the defendants were indicted for selling crack cocaine and. More information about united states courts opinions view in catalog of us government publications find at a local federal depository library. Record demonstrates that bass entered into the plea agreement a nd the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, see nguyen v united states , 114 f3d 699, 703 (8th cir. 862 united states v bass no 01-1471 supreme court of the united states decided june 28, 2002 on petition for writ of certiorari to the united.

No 15-20078 united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit equal employment opportunity commission, plaintiff-appellee, v bass pro outdoor world, llc. United states vs microsoft corporation introduction the department of justice investigated microsoft corporation for anti-trust behavior throughout the 1990’s 19 states complained against microsoft for practicing monopolistic behavior, following the investigation, the case went to trial. Facts of the case in 1998, john bass, a black man, was charged with two counts of homicide with a firearm in federal court, and the government filed notice of the intent to pursue the death penalty.

In united states v armstrong, 517 u s 456, 465 (1996), we held that a defendant who seeks discovery on a claim of selective prosecution must show some evidence of both discriminatory effect and discriminatory intent. The united states concedes that the survey shows a statistical disparity at the charging stage, but argues that bass's evidence does not satisfy the similarly situated requirement because bass has failed to identify white defendants who could have been charged with death-eligible crimes but were not. Respondent was convicted of possessing firearms in violation of § 1202(a)(1) of the omnibus crime control and safe streets act, which provides that a person convicted of a felony 'who receives, possesses, or transports in commerce or affecting commerce any firearm ' shall be punished as. Join over 207,000 law students who have used quimbee to achieve academic success in law school through expert-written outlines, a massive bank of case briefs, engaging video lessons, comprehensive practice exams with model answers, and practice questions.

United states v district court for eagle county citation: 401 us 520 court: us supreme court date: march 24, 1971. The virginia tbf youth is virginia's premier youth bass fishing program our program is designed to educate the youth anglers about the sport of bass fishing as well as environmental conservation we welcome all anglers to join from ages 7-18 years old we have a junior and high school program. 536 us 862 (2002) united states v bass no 01-1471 united states supreme court decided june 28, 2002 on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. A case in which the court held that a defendant who is seeking discovery against the united states government for a claim of selective prosecution must produce evidence of discriminatory effect and intent.

United states, 283 u s 15 (1931) cooper v united states, 280 u s 409 (1930) some of its decisions have stated that the validity of a retroactive tax provision under the due process clause depends upon whether retroactive application is so harsh and oppressive as to transgress the constitutional limitation. United states of america, plaintiff-appellee, v darrell kenneth bass, wilbur edward hand and hugh field, defendants-appellants. United states v behrens, 230 f2d 504, 506-507 this is to say that the cash surrender value is no part of the proceeds, but represents merely the right of the insured to cancel the policy, and thereupon receive back from the insurer the amount accumulated from premiums paid in the past and held to cover the risk to be incurred in the future. Case no 14-1387 united states v bass - 3 - minutes after officers threatened to use a battering ram, bass finally opened the door and was arrested with his burgundy kyocera torino cell phone still in his hand.

Larry bass was convicted by a jury of four drug-related offenses and one count of possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 usc § 924(c)(1)(a) bass appeals his firearm conviction, contending that the evidence was. United states v bass findlaw, case opinion for us 6th circuit united states v bass read the court's full decision on findlaw united states v bass oyez, a case in which the court held that a defendant who is seeking discovery against the united states government for a claim of selective. United states v bass, no 01-1471 the us supreme court reversed a sixth circuit opinion upholding a federal court's decision to grant defendant john bass's discovery motion based on selective prosecution.

united states v bass Opinion for united states v bass — brought to you by free law project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. united states v bass Opinion for united states v bass — brought to you by free law project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
United states v bass
Rated 3/5 based on 47 review

2018.