Singer's principle of the equal consideration of interests: identical interests must be given equal moral weight no matter in what type of being they occur a examples of identical and non-identical interests (eg, spanking a baby and a horse. The ‘irrelevance argument’ singer begins by assuming that the ‘principle of equality’ or ‘principle of equal consideration of interests’ is a basic moral principle the principle says ‘treat all people as equals ’, meaning ‘give equal consideration to the interests of all people’, or ‘treat the interests of all. Singer’s argument starts from a principle of equal consideration of interests this holds that in any situation the interests of all those affected should be considered equally, which may sound, on the face of it, like a utilitarian principle.
The fundamental interest that entitles a being to equal consideration is the capacity for suffering and/or enjoyment or happiness singer holds that a being's interests should always be weighed according to that being's concrete properties. Sacrificing a major interest of a being in order to satisfy a minor interest of another being violates the principle of equal consideration of interests therefore, some farming practices violate the principle of equal consideration of interests. Krantz examines peter singer's principle of the equal consideration of the interests of all animals with a view to showing that its current popularity and possible wholesale adoption for the future threaten human values in a variety of ways. Many philosophers and other writers have proposed the principle of equal consideration of interests, in some form or other, as a basic moral principle but not many of them have recognized that this principle applies to members of other species as well as to our own.
Gives either exclusive or primary consideration to human interests above the good of other species explain singer's principle of the equal consideration of interests and why it requires us to treat all animals as equals. So the principle of equality requires that we give equal consideration to the interests of all sentient creatures speciesism many of our current practices are speciesist - they give greater weight to the interests - to the pain and pleasure - of members of our own species. An influential argument against speciesism, advanced by singer, rests on what he calls the principle of equal consideration of interests (pec) this is the claim that one should give equal weight in one’s moral decision making to the like interests of all those affected by one’s actions.
Peter singer- animal liberation equal consideration =/= equal treatment equal consideration = gauging other subject's capacities and treating them in a way that protects their interests from arbitrary abuse. Singer, peter 1974 all animals are equal philosophical exchange 1 reprinted in lafollette, hugh (ed) 2007 so, taking into equal consideration the comparable interests of all sentient beings does not necessarily force us to treat all sentient beings equally if, for instance, singer, all animals are equal. Rich interests, the principle of equal consideration for equal interests as singer interprets it allows for legitimate preference for humans when human and animal interests are in conflict 5 if a human child has an interest in learning arithmetic, and nothing so fine can.
One of the main thoughts in peter singer’s book practical ethics is that we have to extend the principle of equal consideration of interests—which demands “that we give equal weight in our moral deliberations to the like interests of all those affected by our actions” (1993: 21)—also to. The basic principle of equality does not require equal or identical treatment it requires equal considera-tion equal consideration for different beings may lead to differ- give everyone’s interests equal consideration-although these all animals are equal may are the anlmal. Peter singer is not the first utilitarian to argue that the interests of animals should be taken seriously jeremy bentham, for example, had a section detailing the question in his work introduction to the principles of morals and legislation.
Equal consideration of interests is a moral principle that states that one should both include all affected interests when calculating the rightness of an action and weigh those interests equally. The principle of equal consideration of interests extends to every being who has interests, which means every being who is capable of conscious preferences, or likes or dislikes the limit of consciousness, rather than the limit of species, is the point beyond which equal consideration of interests cannot go, simply because beyond that limit. Peter singer the argument for extending the principle of equality beyond our own species is simple, so simple that it amounts to no more than a clear understanding of the nature of the principle of equal consideration of interests but the result of so doing is, of course, to give. Animals are not entitled to not all the same rights but to an equal consideration of interests animals should not be given the same moral consideration because they are do not have the same power to reason as humans animals do not have rights unless they can demonstrate the same abilities as humans instructor explanation: the answer can be found on p 4 of peter singer’s “all animals.
In order to understand peter singer’s article “all animals are equal”, one has to look at his viewpoint and perspective singer believes in the equal consideration of interests, and that we should extend this basic principle to other species singer states, “the interests of every being affected by an action are to be taken into. The principle of equal consideration of interests essentially this means that if an animal feels pain, the pain matters as much as it does when a human feels pain - if the pain hurt just as much how bad pain and suffering are does not depend on the species of being that experiences it. In speciesismon what he calls the principle of equal consideration of interests (pec) this is the claim that one should give equal weight in one’s moral decision making to the like interests of all those affected by one’s actions.